×

Major Change to Advance Parole Travel for Individuals with Unlawful Presence

Home
News & Events
Immigration Law
Major Change to Advance Parole Travel for Individuals with Unlawful Presence

On August 13, 2026, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) issued a significant decision changing the consequences of international travel on advance parole for some individuals who have previously accrued unlawful presence in the United States.

In Matter of Delcarmen-Lara, 29 I&N Dec. 830 (BIA 2026), the BIA held that leaving the United States with advance parole is a “departure” for purposes of the unlawful presence bars. The decision overturns more than a decade of prior BIA precedent.

What Changed?

Under U.S. immigration law, certain individuals who accrue unlawful presence and then depart the United States may become inadmissible for three or ten years. Generally, the three-year bar applies after more than 180 days but less than one year of unlawful presence, while the ten-year bar applies after one year or more.

Since 2012, the BIA’s decision in Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly provided an important protection for individuals traveling with advance parole. Under that decision, travel authorized by advance parole was not considered a “departure” that triggered the unlawful presence bars.

The BIA has now overruled Arrabally and Yerrabelly. Going forward, a person who has accrued sufficient unlawful presence may trigger a three- or ten-year bar by leaving the United States even when the person has a valid advance parole document.

Does This Affect Past Travel?

Importantly, the BIA stated that its new rule will apply prospectively. The Board recognized that people have relied on the prior rule for many years and declined to apply its new interpretation to the advance parole travel that had already occurred in the case before it.

This means the decision should not change the consequences of advance parole travel that occurred before the BIA issued Matter of Delcarmen-Lara on August 13, 2026.

Who Should Be Concerned?

This decision does not mean that everyone with advance parole should stop traveling. The unlawful presence bars apply only when an individual has accrued the amount of unlawful presence required by the statute.

However, the decision may have serious consequences for some individuals with advance parole based on:

  • A pending adjustment of status application
  • Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
  • Temporary Protected Status (TPS)
  • A pending asylum application
  • Other immigration benefits that may allow advance parole travel

Whether someone has accrued “unlawful presence” is not always the same as whether the person has been without lawful immigration status. The calculation can be complicated and depends on the person’s individual immigration history.

What Should You Do Before Traveling?

If you have ever been in the United States without lawful status or remained in the United States beyond a period of authorized stay, do not assume that an advance parole document makes international travel safe.

Before leaving the United States, you should speak with an immigration attorney who can review your complete immigration history, determine whether you have accrued unlawful presence, and evaluate whether departure could trigger a three- or ten-year bar or another ground of inadmissibility.

Individuals who have already traveled on advance parole should not assume that this decision has created a new problem with their prior travel. The BIA specifically chose to apply its new rule prospectively.

Because Matter of Delcarmen-Lara represents a significant change in immigration law, we expect additional guidance and potentially litigation concerning how the decision will be applied. Delgado Rompf Bruen LLC will continue to monitor these developments.

If you have questions about how this decision affects your ability to travel or your pending immigration case, please contact our office to schedule a consultation.

Please contact our office to schedule a consultation appointment. During your consultation, our attorneys will review your immigration options with you and answer any questions you may have.

Call
(312) 216-5116

Triumphs on the
Immigration journey

Categories

Archives

Posts You May Also Like

How to Establish Good Moral Character When Applying for U.S. Citizenship

How to Establish Good Moral Character When Applying for U.S. Citizenship

One of the requirements for becoming a U.S. citizen through naturalization is demonstrating “good moral character,” often referred to as GMC. USCIS does not…

Birthright Citizenship After the Supreme Court Decision: What the New Executive Orders Mean

Birthright Citizenship After the Supreme Court Decision: What the New Executive Orders Mean

On June 30, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important decision protecting birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court held that children…

New Rules Provide Relief for R-1 Religious Workers Reaching the Five-Year Limit

New Rules Provide Relief for R-1 Religious Workers Reaching the Five-Year Limit

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has made an important change for religious workers in R-1 nonimmigrant status who reach the five-year maximum period…

Reviews From Our Clients

Request a Consultation

"*" indicates required fields